This was just recently released and I think this is a very important study
This is crucial because it’s the first study based on actual data from an actual UCM (user centric model) with enough users (Soundcloud) when all other studies used to extrapolate UCM out of the pro-rata models data which was in my view an absolute non sense. And unsurprisingly, past studies were often saying UCM wouldn’t change anything or could even be worse for mid-tier artists than pro-rata. Turns out they were probably wrong.
This brings me back to my proposition for a S2O user centric subscription
If it turns out user centric is, indeed, naturally more inclined to pay mid-tier artists, a carefully crafted S2O user centric model could in effect be an even better offering for both these same artists, and also for artists that you listen to a lot for just a few weeks and then let go.
I feel like while the emphasis put on “super fans” is nice, what’s lacking in the current UCM implemented by soundcloud, is the more temporary relationship people can build with an artist for a month or two before they stop listening to it. In the soundcloud model, you do get more money than in a pro rata model from that, but not substantially more unless people listen to your stuff all year long.
In a S2O User Centric Model however, you can actually get close to the equivalent of someone buying physical/digital goods from your store in just a few weeks/months, and it doesn’t matter if they stop listening to your music later on because either they already own it, or they’ve already given to you close to the equivalent of 10€.
I really think this is a discussion we should have because it’s where a lot of current talk is at, and we have enough of a new approach to it that we could really be of some help crafting a solution that :
1/ doesn’t rely on a private owned company doing some shady business on the side
2/ is actually better.